The book, Making Sense of Your World is a basic introductory text to worldview published by Phillip with the aim of covering all the aspects that appertain to the aspects of men’s worldview perception. In this study, I seek to present a demonstrative understanding and a comprehensive critique of the text, based on the practical, intellectual, and spiritual applications. This is to the extent that I perceive this book as unique in its context, considering the extensive growth of the evangelistically body of worldview literature. Most people have used this book as a point of comparison and reference for the many texts, written under similar themes such as the book The Universe Next Door by Jim Sire and Understanding The Times by David Noebel. These examples show the extents to which the book aids in the construction of Biblical worldviews in various aspects.
This book is divided into three main, but congruent parts, which are also relational. These parts include a comparison of the basic worldviews, contrasting and defending the Biblical worldviews with other people, and a construction of the worldview in part one, two, and three, respectively. In all these parts, I note that the text welcomes everyone that regards themselves as Christians to critically think and reflect on the themes described in the book through a continual study of the text and its related recommended books.
In the first part of the book that compares the basic worldviews to Biblical teachings, the authors seek to define this concept of Biblical worldview through a summary of other inter-relational views. This part serves as an introduction to the preceding parts. For instance, in part two, the authors now concentrate on the pivotal worldviews of issues, in relation to the Biblical view. They achieve this by a description and defending of the distinct biblical views on such issues such as the problem of evil, why there is too much suffering and the issue of religious pluralism. The third section now offers a platform for the application of the worldview perspectives to the family, individual, church and global platforms. The main argument presented in this context is that there is a distinctly Biblical view of world issues that outlines the differentiation in the manner in which people relate to the spheres.
On page 8th of the book, the authors provide a definition of the worldview to entail the framework of the most basic beliefs that shape the human view of and for the world around us. This definition also presents the basis upon which the human decisions are to be made, and the actions resulting from the made decisions. This is because the basic beliefs are fundamental and determine the human behaviors and values. Accordingly, the authors note that the Christian view becomes the responsibility and opportunity for Christians to think and live, according to the views of life set out in the scriptures. The argument is that the perceptions of Christians, in relation to their views and actions, differ from those of other people in the world towards the same worldviews. However, the main question would be whether Christians really have the different worldviews and what forms the basis for the differentiation in the views and actions among men?
As it is indicated in the book at several instances, no single Biblical or Christian worldview exists, except for human beings having different perception of their relational behaviors. Ideally, the main concern of authors is not to provide a divergent view of Biblical beliefs or a legitimate relational biblical interpretation, but seek to provide a believer’s church position that relates to the covenantal or spiritual view of God’s people. Less emphasis is laid on the denominational and sectarian distinctions that exist among Christians.
An aspect of understanding this book relates to the realization of the fact that the authors have strove to limit their use of theological jargons that are essentially unnecessary. Instead, greater focus is put on the definition of terms in a manner that is easily identifiable to non-experts. In the sense of providing practical understanding of the text, helpful illustrations and examples are used to connect to the theoretical ideals. This leads them to the defense of the beliefs by the Christian Orthodox churches on grounds that are appealing and winsome.
My understanding and comprehension of the text is also based on the acceptance of the fact that we all are Christians and probably destined citizens for heaven. However, in the context of Biblical views, people will embrace the appropriateness of spending time in Biblical materials. My thinking has always been that matters of religion, spirituality, worship, and doctrines are dealt with in the church, while matters that relate to education, medicine, and psychology should not concern Christians, given that the destiny is in heaven. However, as it is shown by the authors in the text, this way of thinking, which is quite popular among Christians and Non-Christians, in a similar way, has no Biblical foundation. This is because religion, as was designed and instituted by God, was not meant to be compartmentalized. Instead, men were designed as stewards and have the responsibility to care for creation.
The greatest spiritual contextual application of the themes by the authors is that the worldviews of life by Christians and Non-Christians should be exercised in accordance to the views revealed by the scriptures. While it may seem essential to form one’s opinions and views about matters related to spirituality, the introductory worldview should be used to understand the right and wrong views of biblical teachings. The problem with this perspective lies on the tragic beliefs that people develop, based on the thoughts that they can just live by the worldviews without taking the time to analyze the facts.
Consequently, the development of intentional, conscious, and comprehensive biblical worldviews should enable a person to form a faithful mandate of protecting creation, while not accepting the critical views or philosophies that are unbiblical.
An additional perspective relies with the acceptance of the ultimate reality of God. What this means is that the understanding of the world views has practical life implications on the philosophical discussions that relate to morality. The rationale is that the Christian life is not only an anti-intellectual pursuit. That is, as the intellectual pursuits are made by men, so should the spiritual pursuits. God being the creator of all the disciplines we practice, the relational understanding of the worldviews from whichever perspective should have strong and deeply rooted foundations on the biblical teachings, discussed by the authors.
The shift in culture from biblical theism to other formational beliefs has led to the erosion of particular worldviews that were enshrined in the Bible. While it is universally acceptable that the proposed worldviews have consequences that are practical and logical, most of the professed Christians have not succeeded in the formulation or development of Biblical views that are in line with their spiritual professions. Instead, most submit to mental secularization and accept various aspects or pieces of non-biblical worldviews that suit their lives. This should not be the case, as discussed in this book, since the scripture provides a correct and comprehensive worldview that comes in handy in the spiritual pursuits of men.
Human perceptions and interpretations of the worldly occurrences shape the underlying presuppositions in relation to the culture. As the authors have noted in the book, the increasing diversity in culture pre-empts the experiences felt. The challenge comes when one finds it difficult to separate wisdom from the views. Whether consciously or subconsciously, the acceptance of the worldviews helps in the orientation of the intellectual and spiritual terrain. Thus, ignoring the worldviews would only result in the detrimental destruction of our own personalities. Acceptance of these beliefs would aid in the erosion of beliefs that most people have held on neutrality of science.
Finally, from the reflection and review made on this book and its theme contexts, I have come to the understanding that a person’s worldview of matters provides the meaning, categories and the determination of the relationships that each segment of an individual’s life will have on others. Phillip et al’s translation of the Biblical verse found in Romans 12:1 – 2, is a clear proof of this aspect in a person’s life. The main idea in these verses is that the world in which we live should not squeeze us to the extent that we fit into its mould but, that God re-make us and change our whole attitude. Understanding of this passage also comes as a warning that men should not be too accustomed to their culture to the extent that they fit into its ideals without second thoughts. Instead, attention should be fixed on God and Biblical or theological teachings that will transform a person from inside out.
About the author
Betty Bove loves her cat Josie and her work at the best essay editing service. It's a reputable writing service. Skilled writers help students to cope with troubles with writing tasks. Betty happy to be a member of this team.